Amir Rapaport’s Weekly Column: The War Is Reaching a Dangerous Phase.
Is Khayn Yunis next?
Hamas has lost control over what is happening in the northern Gaza Strip from a civilian point of view, but is far from surrender. The combats are only expected to intensify
Amir Rapaport
|
17/11/2023
Currently, the IDF's operation in the Gaza Strip is unfolding as if a hostage deal is not on the agenda. Of the three main objectives of the war – dismantling Hamas' control in Gaza, undermining its military capabilities, and returning the hostages – the first goal is progressing the fastest. Hamas has indeed lost control over civilian affairs in the Gaza Strip, mainly in the north, but is far from surrendering. The fighting has not diminished, and it is expected to intensify further.
Let's start with the dilemma of the hostages. This is the third time that Yahya Sinwar has faced Benjamin Netanyahu with a difficult and fateful decision. In October 2011, Netanyahu asked the government secretary, Zvika Hauser, to convene a cabinet meeting to approve the deal to release 1,027 Palestinian prisoners in exchange for Gilad Shalit. Sinwar, who entered prison as a "Khan Yunis Butcher" in 1989, was then the undisputed leader of the prisoners, and he was the one who conducted the negotiations with Israel.
Before calling the ministers, Hauser phoned the political advisor, Ron Dermer, who was home, sick. "Did you know?!" he asked him, and received a resounding negative answer. A few days later, Sinwar was released from prison, although he was unwilling to sign a commitment not to engage in terrorism again.
During the second dilemma, in November 2018, Netanyahu was required to choose between Yahya Sinwar and the Defense Minister, Avigdor Liberman, who vehemently opposed any "arrangement" with Hamas, including the transfer of the infamous suitcases of cash from Qatar. In retrospect, we know that Sinwar, who was already the official leader of Hamas in the Gaza Strip, made a concerted effort to persuade Netanyahu with a handwritten letter, in Hebrew, urging him to take a "calculated risk." Netanyahu chose Sinwar, and Liberman resigned.
Regarding the November 2023 dilemma, with all due respect to the cabinet discussing the hostage issue, the cruel weight of the decision, perhaps the most morally challenging dilemma ever – whether to release only some of the hostages in exchange for Palestinian prisoners and a few days of ceasing fire – once again falls mostly on the shoulders of Netanyahu.
What exactly does the proposed deal include? How will it be implemented? The emotional roller coaster that each of us experiences in light of the publications about the progress (and setbacks) in the talks leads to the conclusion that it is preferable to wait in suspense for developments.
In the words of the IDF spokesperson: "When there is something, we will update the families first and then the public." Those abovementioned publications contain a lot of disinformation from all sides, aiming to influence the negotiation process.
Either way, the question of whether a deal will take place or not will have immediate implications for the IDF's operations deep in the Gaza Strip. A temporary ceasefire of a few days would allow Hamas to evacuate wounded individuals from the tunnels and, more importantly, gain intelligence on the IDF's deployment above ground – enabling them to launch attacks immediately when the fire resumes. This could potentially result in casualties for our forces, but the IDF believes it can renew the pressure on Hamas with the same success as in the first three weeks of the ground maneuver, more or less.
The "bug" in assessing the chances of a deal primarily exists when looking at the situation from Yahya Sinwar's perspective: If the Defense Minister repeatedly says that even after a partial deal, Israel will continue to fight until the complete destruction of Hamas and the killing of its leaders, then what is the real purpose of such a deal in Sinwar’s view?
Perhaps he believes he can prolong the ceasefire that will be achieved and bring about the end of the war? Or maybe he thinks that the dozens of children and foreign citizens currently held in the Gaza Strip are now more of a burden than an asset to Hamas (as President Joe Biden stated this week)?
Is Sinwar serious about the negotiations for a deal, or is he just conducting a cruel psychological war, as in the horrific video of the captured soldier Adi Marciano, who died in captivity? Is he rational in his decisions at all, or determined to fight from the bunker to the last bullet? How many of the hostages are still alive?
Rare-earth elements between the United States of America and the People's Republic of China
The Eastern seas after Afghanistan: the UK and Australia come to the rescue of the United States in a clumsy way
The failure of the great games in Afghanistan from the 19th century to the present day
Russia, Turkey and United Arab Emirates. The intelligence services organize and investigate
Hamas has lost control over what is happening in the northern Gaza Strip from a civilian point of view, but is far from surrender. The combats are only expected to intensify
Currently, the IDF's operation in the Gaza Strip is unfolding as if a hostage deal is not on the agenda. Of the three main objectives of the war – dismantling Hamas' control in Gaza, undermining its military capabilities, and returning the hostages – the first goal is progressing the fastest. Hamas has indeed lost control over civilian affairs in the Gaza Strip, mainly in the north, but is far from surrendering. The fighting has not diminished, and it is expected to intensify further.
Let's start with the dilemma of the hostages. This is the third time that Yahya Sinwar has faced Benjamin Netanyahu with a difficult and fateful decision. In October 2011, Netanyahu asked the government secretary, Zvika Hauser, to convene a cabinet meeting to approve the deal to release 1,027 Palestinian prisoners in exchange for Gilad Shalit. Sinwar, who entered prison as a "Khan Yunis Butcher" in 1989, was then the undisputed leader of the prisoners, and he was the one who conducted the negotiations with Israel.
Before calling the ministers, Hauser phoned the political advisor, Ron Dermer, who was home, sick. "Did you know?!" he asked him, and received a resounding negative answer. A few days later, Sinwar was released from prison, although he was unwilling to sign a commitment not to engage in terrorism again.
During the second dilemma, in November 2018, Netanyahu was required to choose between Yahya Sinwar and the Defense Minister, Avigdor Liberman, who vehemently opposed any "arrangement" with Hamas, including the transfer of the infamous suitcases of cash from Qatar. In retrospect, we know that Sinwar, who was already the official leader of Hamas in the Gaza Strip, made a concerted effort to persuade Netanyahu with a handwritten letter, in Hebrew, urging him to take a "calculated risk." Netanyahu chose Sinwar, and Liberman resigned.
Regarding the November 2023 dilemma, with all due respect to the cabinet discussing the hostage issue, the cruel weight of the decision, perhaps the most morally challenging dilemma ever – whether to release only some of the hostages in exchange for Palestinian prisoners and a few days of ceasing fire – once again falls mostly on the shoulders of Netanyahu.
What exactly does the proposed deal include? How will it be implemented? The emotional roller coaster that each of us experiences in light of the publications about the progress (and setbacks) in the talks leads to the conclusion that it is preferable to wait in suspense for developments.
In the words of the IDF spokesperson: "When there is something, we will update the families first and then the public." Those abovementioned publications contain a lot of disinformation from all sides, aiming to influence the negotiation process.
Either way, the question of whether a deal will take place or not will have immediate implications for the IDF's operations deep in the Gaza Strip. A temporary ceasefire of a few days would allow Hamas to evacuate wounded individuals from the tunnels and, more importantly, gain intelligence on the IDF's deployment above ground – enabling them to launch attacks immediately when the fire resumes. This could potentially result in casualties for our forces, but the IDF believes it can renew the pressure on Hamas with the same success as in the first three weeks of the ground maneuver, more or less.
The "bug" in assessing the chances of a deal primarily exists when looking at the situation from Yahya Sinwar's perspective: If the Defense Minister repeatedly says that even after a partial deal, Israel will continue to fight until the complete destruction of Hamas and the killing of its leaders, then what is the real purpose of such a deal in Sinwar’s view?
Perhaps he believes he can prolong the ceasefire that will be achieved and bring about the end of the war? Or maybe he thinks that the dozens of children and foreign citizens currently held in the Gaza Strip are now more of a burden than an asset to Hamas (as President Joe Biden stated this week)?
Is Sinwar serious about the negotiations for a deal, or is he just conducting a cruel psychological war, as in the horrific video of the captured soldier Adi Marciano, who died in captivity? Is he rational in his decisions at all, or determined to fight from the bunker to the last bullet? How many of the hostages are still alive?